Join us

What performs better, SQL FILTER or CASE?

What performs better, SQL FILTER or CASE?

The author of this article explores whether there is a performance impact of using FILTER in SQL, specifically PostgreSQL, or if it is just syntax sugar for a CASE expression in an aggregate function.

While the two types of aggregate function expressions can be proven to mean exactly the same thing, the author ran a benchmark comparing the performance of using FILTER versus CASE, and found that there is a consistent 8% performance penalty for using the CASE syntax compared to the FILTER syntax.

The article concludes that while in a perfect world two provably equivalent SQL syntaxes would also perform the same way, this isn't always the case in the real world where optimizers make tradeoffs between time spent optimizing rare syntaxes and time spent executing queries. The author recommends using FILTER as it is already better performing and better looking.


Let's keep in touch!

Stay updated with my latest posts and news. I share insights, updates, and exclusive content.

Unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing, you share your email with @faun and accept our Terms & Privacy.

Give a Pawfive to this post!


Only registered users can post comments. Please, login or signup.

Start writing about what excites you in tech — connect with developers, grow your voice, and get rewarded.

Join other developers and claim your FAUN.dev() account now!

Avatar

The FAUN

FAUN.dev()

@faun
The FAUN watches over the forest of developers. It roams between Kubernetes clusters, code caves, AI trails, and cloud canopies, gathering the signals that matter and clearing out the noise.
Developer Influence
3k

Influence

302k

Total Hits

3711

Posts