Join us
@idjuric660 ・ Jul 24,2025 ・ 6 min read・ Originally posted on mailtrap.io
Reliably sending critical and time-sensitive emails while staying compliant with international data regulation laws is key for any FinTech company out there.
In this article, I’ll provide you with 5 SMTP providers for FinTech that will allow you to achieve all of the above, and more.
To get you started, here’s a snapshot of the platforms, and here’s the methodology and criteria I used to select the providers on this list.
Disclaimer: The references to software ratings, available features, and pricing were valid at the time of writing this article, but could be subject to change in the future.
Click on a platform name to jump ahead to the detailed review.
For your convenience, here’s a table that sums up the most important points of each SMTP provider:
Before we proceed with the reviews, let’s quickly go over why you need specialized transactional email services for FinTech in the first place.
First and foremost, you need to make sure your transactional emails, that is, payment confirmations, e-invoices, 2FA codes, new device logins, etc., get delivered instantly with no hiccups whatsoever.
Why? Well, they’re tied to real-time user actions, so even a delay of a few seconds can lead to a failed login or an abandoned transaction. This, in turn, loses users’ trust, which is key in FinTech since there is sensitive data in play.
With this, a specialized SMTP provider can help you by offering the following:
Example use case
You own a neobank, a challenger bank, or BNPL app, and your user needs to receive a one-time password (OTP). If the email with the OTP doesn’t arrive in the user’s inbox, they might face account lockout. So, in this case, you don’t just lose trust, but your customer support team gets more unnecessary work on their hands.
Unlike with eCommerce companies, whose emails are a bit static (e.g., cart abandonment emails aren’t sent in blasts), in Fintech, emails can be more dynamic due to market shifts. So, your email infrastructure needs to be scalable in order to withstand new feature emails, regional launches, tax notifications, suspicious activity etc.
That is, an SMTP provider needs to be able to handle the increasing load without any bottlenecks or hiccups. To achieve this, a provider should have:
Example use case
You own a crypto exchange, a market cap website, or a trading platform, all of which can acquire a massive number of users in a short time. To register an account, your users need to verify emails, upload documents, connect their digital wallets, make a deposit, etc.
Since the whole account activation process requires you to send them multiple transactional emails, from account confirmations and document approval notifications to welcome emails, your infrastructure needs to be able to withstand the spike in sending volume.
Let’s be honest, if you’re in FinTech, you’re probably knee-deep or at least have been in regulations and compliance. Unfortunately, I have to tell you that there’s a whole lot more of them when it comes to emails.
Namely, since you deal with sensitive information, financial data, or even documents related to identity verification, regulations like GDPR, standards such as PCI DSS, and certifications like ISO 27001 require you to be transparent about user consent, have data protection mechanisms in place, auditable logs, and the list goes on.
Not complying with these usually results in massive fines. Take the CAN-SPAM Act, for instance, which penalizes users for violations with fines of up to $44k per email.
To help you comply with email rules and regulations, and other email marketing laws, an SMTP provider needs to provide you with:
Example use case
You’re sending custom invoices, loan approval, or P2P payments documents that can include sensitive customer information on payment terms, credit scores, etc. To ensure the data doesn’t get into the wrong hands, an SMTP provider needs to enforce TLS and DKIM policies for all outbound emails.
For instance, Mailtrap requires each sender to have proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) before they start sending, so each domain is properly checked and prepared.
Now, let me explain how I came up with the providers on this list and the criteria I used to determine whether they can be the right choice for your FinTech company.
Every email deliverability expert out there will tell you that a solid infrastructure consists of four key components: deliverability, reliability, scalability, and separate sending streams.
Email deliverability refers to the SMTP provider’s ability to deliver your emails to your recipients’ inboxes. To achieve a high rate, providers use dedicated IP, have proper IP warmup protocols and authentication, and more. Additionally, they might offer some features to help you increase the performance of your emails as well, such as bounce tracking and inbox placement insights.
However, it’s important to note that deliverability % between providers differs greatly and that sometimes, the advertised deliverability rate also differs from the actual one.
Over at Mailtrap, we wanted to see how big of a difference this is, so we’ve decided to conduct tests with several top SMTP providers. To make the tests fair to everyone, we used:
Here’s a table with summarized test results:
Email service provider | Email placement results | Spam filter rating | Inbox email delivery with top providers |
Mailtrap | Inbox: 78.8% Tabs: 4.8%Spam: 14.4%Missing: 2.0% | Google Spam Filter: Not spam; Not phishy Barracuda: Score 0Spam Assassin: Score: -3.8 | Gmail (4 years+): 67.50% Gmail (6 months+): 67.50%Google Workspace: 100%Outlook: 77.78%Exchange (Office365): 66.67%Hotmail: 100%Yahoo: 55.56%AOL: 75%Zoho: 50% |
Amazon SES | Inbox: 77.1% Tabs: 1.9%Spam: 20.0%Missing: 1.0% | Google Spam Filter: Not spam; Not phishy Barracuda: Score 0Spam Assassin: Score: -4.3 | Gmail (4 years+): 22.22% Gmail (6 months+): 87.50%Google Workspace: 33.33%Outlook: 100%Exchange (Office365): 66.67%Hotmail: 100%Yahoo: 44.44%AOL: 75%Zoho: 100% |
Mailgun | Inbox: 71.4% Tabs: 3.8%Spam: 23.8%Missing: 1.0% | Google Spam Filter: Not spam; Not phishy Barracuda: Score 0Spam Assassin: Score: -5.3 | Gmail (4 years+): 100% Gmail (6 months+): 100%Google Workspace: 100%Outlook: 66.67%Exchange (Office365): 66.67%Hotmail: 40%Yahoo: 33.33%AOL: 50%Zoho: 0% |
SendGrid | Inbox: 61.0% Tabs: 1.0%Spam: 17.1%Missing: 20.9% | Google Spam Filter: Not spam; Not phishy Barracuda: Score 0Spam Assassin: Score: -0.1 | Gmail (4 years+): 75% Gmail (6 months+): 100%Google Workspace: 66.67%Outlook: 0%Exchange (Office365): 33.33%Hotmail: 0%Yahoo: 33.33%AOL: 50%Zoho: 100% |
Postmark | Inbox: 83.3% Tabs: 1.0%Spam: 14.3%Missing: 0.9% | Google Spam Filter: Not spam; Not phishy Barracuda: Score 0Spam Assassin: Score: -4.3 | Gmail (4 years+): 100% Gmail (6 months+): 100%Google Workspace: 100%Outlook: 100%Exchange (Office365): 66.67%Hotmail: 80%Yahoo: 77.78%AOL: 25.00%Zoho: 100% |
Over to you: I know that the deliverability rate can seem like just one more metric, but you should be aware that you lose $0.11 for every undelivered email. And according to our recent research, finance and insurance share the number one spot for landing in spam folders, with a staggering rate of 8.4% of total emails. Not to mention the meager 80% of actual delivered emails and 11.6% of them going MIA.
Additionally, you need to pay extra attention to your deliverability since all major inbox providers, including Google, Yahoo, Outlook, and Apple Mail, have implemented their very own sending requirements and recommendations, which impact email senders.
So there’s some food for thought for you.
I hope you found this comparison of the top SMTP providers for FinTech companies insightful. Please note that this article presents only a part of an original and complete analysis published on Mailtrap Blog. Visit us there to explore all five providers in more detail.
Join other developers and claim your FAUN.dev account now!
Technical Content Writer, Mailtrap
@idjuric660Influence
Total Hits
Posts